# Candidate-action ledger

Synthetic local review only. Evidence timestamps are elapsed from 2026-10-08T10:00:00+01:00 (Europe/London). Full authorized transcript read; labels confirmed and recording complete. Classification does not imply task creation or approval.

| Candidate | Classification | Evidence | Disposition |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Internal checklist v3 | update | T02–T05, 00:18–01:25; snapshot T-014 | Propose due date 2026-10-08 → 2026-10-09; retain owner-e02 and in_progress. |
| “send the new-starter checklist on Friday” | duplicate | T06, 01:50: “It is the same T-014 commitment we just discussed, not a second checklist or a second task.” | Fold into T-014; no second proposal. |
| Checklist v2 | duplicate | T07–T08, 02:15–02:28: “T-011 is complete. We are not reopening it or sending version 2 again.”; snapshot T-011 | Historical completion only; no reopen or resend. |
| Starter portal redesign | clarification | T09–T10, 03:02–03:19: “I am brainstorming, not committing to that work.” | Idea only, excluded from task proposals; no owner, date, or active clarification required. |
| Contractor coverage in seat audit | clarification | T11–T12, 04:05–04:31; T19, 08:15 | Hold owner/date blank; distinct from T-019. Review at next meeting without treating that meeting as a deadline. |
| Ask for read access | new | T15–T18, 06:10–07:27, especially T17 commitment | Propose owner-m01 request by 2026-10-12; no matching exported task; no minted task ID. |
| Access grant and approval existence | clarification | T15–T16, 06:10–06:42; T18, 07:27: “Today's transcript cannot answer either question.” | Both unknown; hearsay is not verification. No restricted contents accessed. |

The CSV contains two actionable proposals and one held clarification. This ledger records duplicate/background dispositions without adding tracker work. The next meeting at 2026-10-13T10:00:00+01:00 is context (T19–T20), not a calendar action. T-027 remains separate vendor work; T-019 remains separate monthly reporting work.