PlaysbyMoat8
Back to the library

A CURATED STARTING POINT

24 AI workflows for agencies and client service teams

Choose a practical AI workflow for client meetings, proposals, delivery or finance. See the inputs, review decisions and a small pilot to try.

A client asks for two more edits. A proposal needs to go out. Finance needs to know which completed work has been billed. Each task sounds simple until the answer depends on a conversation, an agreement and a delivery record held in different places.

This collection follows that work from the first client conversation through delivery and billing. Start with one recurring task your team already understands. Read its guide, identify the current source records, and agree what a useful result should look like before choosing tools.

The useful result might be a proposal with an unresolved delivery date, a request split into included and additional work, or a billing question that needs finance review. A clear unknown can be more useful than a confident answer that creates the wrong commitment.

Plays provides the workflow recipes. Moat8's starting point is the company context those recipes need: the relevant records, the process they belong to and the people responsible for decisions. Use the collection to choose a task, then discuss whether a small pilot makes sense for your team.

Who this is for

Agency owners, account leads, delivery managers and operations or finance teams in B2B service businesses. These workflows fit recurring client work with identifiable records and someone who can review the result.

Prepare the company context

One client and one piece of work

Identify the account, project or opportunity consistently across the selected records. Start with a small source set you can inspect. Similar company names and reused project labels need to be resolved before records are combined.

The current agreement

Collect the effective scope, approved prices, amendments and relevant working rules. Keep suggestions from a sales call separate from promises the team has accepted. Include the version and date so a reviewer can check which terms apply.

What actually happened

Use the latest permitted conversations, delivery evidence and system records for the task. A completed task is different from client acceptance; an invoice is different from a payment. Record missing evidence instead of silently filling the gap.

A permitted source set

Agree which records may be used, who may see the output and which AI service may process the material. Authorized exports can be enough for a first test. Copying records into a folder does not automatically preserve the access rules of the original systems.

A reviewer and a useful artifact

Choose the person who can approve the proposal, resolve the scope question or reconcile the payment. Define the output they need: a draft, a comparison, a queue or a short brief with evidence and unresolved items.

Keep people in the review loop

  • Check the client, source versions and relevant dates before reviewing the wording of the result.
  • Verify quantities, allowances and money against the records. Keep different currencies and different business states separate.
  • Show what is confirmed, proposed, missing or disputed. Missing information should lead to a question or a held decision.
  • Agree who may approve each next step. A draft does not authorize a client message, a new commitment, an invoice or a change to a live system.

Choose one task for a first pilot

Bring one recurring task to Moat8, together with a description of its inputs and the person who reviews the result. The first conversation is about fit, source access and a useful test. You do not need to share confidential client material to describe the problem.

  • Pick one owner, one project or account, and one output the team already knows how to judge.
  • Agree the permitted source set and review rules. If access is unresolved, test the process with synthetic material first.
  • Try a small historical sample, such as 5–10 cases, and compare results with a manually checked reference. Record missing context, corrections and total preparation plus review time.
  • If the sample is useful, agree a limited live pilot, its stop conditions and a review date. Adopt, adjust or stop based on the observed results.

Prepare client conversations and follow through

Bring the relevant history into the next conversation. These workflows help an account or sales lead see open commitments, unresolved questions and opportunity changes without treating every old note as current.

Turn interest into agreed work

Move from discovery notes to a reviewable proposal, a checked agreement and a delivery handoff. The shared requirement is a clear boundary between what a client requested, what the team offered and what both sides accepted.

Follow an outstanding agreement through signature

Keep an unsigned agreement connected to its current signer, correspondence and next action. Prepare contextual reminders, stop stale chases and verify completion before closing the log.

Keep delivery and scope aligned

Give delivery leads a current project picture and a way to assess incoming requests. Compare scope, progress and acceptance evidence before promising another task or reporting work as complete.

Create a client project register

Build a reliable register of client engagements, owners, scope, milestones and commercial status. Keep projects distinct from opportunities, invoices and individual tasks.

Run the team with current context

Prepare the next decision, meeting or internal answer from the records the team is allowed to use. Keep the current owner and source visible so a polished summary does not turn an old plan into a new instruction.

Build an action-oriented internal digest

Turn a reporting period or defined absence into a sourced catch-up brief. Bring together selected discussions, documents and requested email, meeting or task changes, with current reader actions first.

Reconcile delivered work and money

Connect accepted work, commercial terms, invoices and payments for finance review. These workflows produce questions and reconciled records; they depend on approved accounting rules and do not establish a collectible balance from an absent document alone.

Create a management P&L

Turn approved accounting records into a traceable profit-and-loss report. Separate revenue, direct costs and overhead, reconcile the totals, and keep uncertain classifications visible.

Make ownership and reviews explicit

Clarify who owns the work, which sources a pilot can use, what an agreement requires and what to improve after a delivery cycle. Choose these when the main obstacle is an unclear process or responsibility.

Three examples of a reviewable result

These examples show the kind of output to aim for and the decision a person still needs to make. Open the linked guide for its full inputs, steps and checks.

Synthetic examples, not reported client results or demonstrations of connected systems.

A proposal that keeps the delivery date open

Example input

The call asks for a two-workshop pilot. The approved offer is 600 USD per workshop, with no tax in this example. The delivery date has not been agreed and the client's budget is unknown.

Illustrative output

A proposal draft with two workshops and a checked total of 1,200 USD. Delivery date: pending. Client budget: unknown. The accompanying email remains a draft.

Human review

The sales owner checks the recipient, scope and approved prices, and resolves the delivery commitment before sending. A correct total does not establish the client's budget or agreement.

Read the complete recipe →
A request split into included and additional work

Example input

The monthly agreement includes four landing-page edits. Three are complete. The client now requests two more edits and a new page.

Illustrative output

One edit fits the remaining allowance. The second edit exceeds it. The new page is additional scope. The account lead receives the supporting scope references and an estimate queue.

Human review

The account lead confirms the effective agreement and completed-work count, then decides what to approve or quote. The classification alone does not authorize work or promise a delivery date.

Read the complete recipe →
A billing gap that needs a payment check

Example input

An accepted milestone has an agreed price of 800 units. The available archive contains no matching invoice, but the payment ledger shows an unallocated client prepayment of 800 units.

Illustrative output

A review item flags a missing billing link and an unresolved prepayment allocation. It does not report 800 units as confirmed money owed.

Human review

Finance checks invoice coverage and payment allocation before establishing a balance or creating an invoice. Missing billing evidence and an unpaid debt are different findings.

Read the complete recipe →

These are editorial guides, not independently tested implementations. Confirm fit, data access, tools and review requirements before a pilot.

FROM A RECIPE TO YOUR WORKFLOW

Bring the company context together.

This workflow needs reliable inputs before it needs a better prompt. Moat8 Vault brings working information into a readable archive for the AI tools you use.

Start with one recurring task, agree which sources to use, and review the first result with your team.

Discuss this workflow

Read the methodology · Browse all workflows

What does your team do?

Choose the recurring work you would like to improve.

A field guide, made for work.

Plays is a curated library of anonymized business workflows. Each recipe explains the inputs, steps, tools, and checks you can adapt to your team. These are editorial guides, not independently tested implementations.

When you share a company website, the guide may read a limited number of public pages on that website. Messages and retrieved page text are sent to our AI provider, NVIDIA, to recommend relevant workflows. Share a general description rather than confidential information.

Saved workflows and selected activities stay in this browser. Your chat history and selected company website are kept in this tab and cleared when you reload or start a new chat. The server does not store conversations. Live source monitoring is not enabled.

If you allow analytics, PostHog receives page views and actions such as workflow saves, skill downloads and link clicks. Random browser and session identifiers connect these actions without identifying you by name. Your choice and browser identifier expire after 90 days; sessions restart after 30 minutes of inactivity or 24 hours. We use local storage, not analytics cookies. Messages, company URLs, search text, full referrers and IP addresses are not sent. There are no person profiles or session recordings. You can decline or withdraw in Analytics settings; Do Not Track and Global Privacy Control keep analytics off.

Read the Plays Privacy Notice ↗